Posted by: people4people | November 17, 2008

Turmoil in The D.R. Congo

A mother displaced by fighting takes shelter from the rain in a makeshift tent

A mother displaced by fighting takes shelter from the rain in a makeshift tent

Aid workers in the Democratic Republic of Congo fear the country is plunging into another civil war that threatens the lives of millions.

Fighting in eastern DRC has already displaced 1.6 million people, said the World Health Organization, as ceasefires have been broken and hundreds of civilians have been slain or wounded.

The UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs said some aid agencies have suspended operations because of fighting in North Kivu province.

“The strong militarization of the area, the looting of houses and the threats of armed men prevent humanitarian workers from working in a safe environment,” a UN report said.

It described a “precarious security situation” in which an unfocused campaign of killing, raping and pillaging has sent thousands of refugees flooding into the provincial capital, Goma.

Ban Ki-moon, the UN Secretary General, said on Tuesday up to 100,000 of them may be cut off by fighting and in urgent need of help.

“Because of the ongoing fighting, these people have received virtually no assistance. Their situation has grown increasingly desperate,” he said.

In the meantime, fears are growing that a cholera outbreak in the sprawling refugee camps could spread, threatening refugees with an epidemic of disease. There have been at least 90 diagnosed cases of cholera in Goma and the refugee centre of Kibati.

Over the weekend, rebel forces led by Laurent Nkunda fought DRC government troops and their local militia allies to the north and southwest of Goma.

“Information is still patchy outside of Goma town’s limits, but there are reports of looting, rapes and burning of temporary camps,” said John Lapointe, a Canadian aid worker in Goma with CARE Canada.

“There are reports of considerable numbers of firefights erupting here and there. It is a firefly effect, you know, it’s unverifiable, but you hear the Mai Mai are attacking here; a para corps is attacking somewhere else and the CNDP [Nkunda's National Congress for the Defence of the People] is attacking someone else.”

“People are coming from as far away as 80 kilometres from Goma,” added Mr. Lapointe, 65, of Gatineau, Que. “These people don’t flee on a whim. They are fleeing for good reason. The situation is very tense.”

The area exploded in a new round of violence on Aug. 28, when Mr. Nkunda’s rebels launched a new offensive against government troops.

As he consolidated his grip on large areas of the provinces of North and South Kivu, close to the border with Rwanda and Uganda, Mr. Nkunda has threatened to capture Goma on the shores of Lake Kivu.

Over the last two weeks, retreating DRC troops sent locals fleeing for their lives and Mr. Nkunda’s CNDP declared a unilateral ceasefire, which has repeatedly been broken by sporadic clashes.

The conflict is fueled by ethnic hatreds unleashed in the 1994 Rwandan genocide, in which nearly one million Tutsis and moderate Hutus were murdered by Hutu extremists.

Rwandan Hutu rebels responsible for the genocide fled to eastern DRC, destabilizing the country, which rapidly collapsed into a prolonged civil war. That war eventually drew in six African armies and killed up to 5.4 million people, mostly from disease and starvation.

“Africa’s World War” did not end until July, 2003, when the UN dispatched its largest peacekeeping operation in history.

But even the presence of the 17,000 peacekeepers has failed to curb fighting that feeds on ethnic hatreds and is fueled with eastern DRC’s vast mineral wealth of gold, tin, coltan and other precious metals.

Mr. Nkunda, a gaunt 40-year old former psychology student, fought with the rebel Rwandan Patriotic Front, the Tutsi-dominated army that seized control of Rwanda after the 1994 genocide. During DRC’s civil war, he was a commander in the Rwandan-backed Rally for Congolese Democracy, which controlled most of eastern DRC. Now, he is threatening to topple the government of Joseph Kabila and says he is fighting to protect minority Tutsis from the Rwandan Hutus who carried out the 1994 genocide.

The DRC borders nine nations and its continued instability threatens all central Africa.

But, so far, the African Union has failed to respond to UN pleas for 3,000 more peacekeepers to restore calm to the region.

An emergency international conference in Kenya on the weekend resulted in little more than a plea for all sides to observe a ceasefire and UN calls for opening a humanitarian corridor to gain access to refugees.

The South African Development Community (SADC), which includes South Africa, and Zimbabwe and Angola (two countries involved in the civil war), also announced Sunday it would send military advisors to help the DRC government.

That commitment could be followed by a new contingent of African peacekeepers, “if and when necessary,” said Tomaz Salamao, SADC executive secretary.

There are widespread reports Angolan military units are already fighting alongside DRC government troops, a move that may pull Rwanda into the conflict to support the CNDP and attack Hutu extremists in DRC.

“The conflict is becoming more complex,” said Alexander Buhler, an aid worker with Caritas in Goma.

“There is a danger the war will attract further international participation and that the whole central Africa region could explode in conflict.”

On Monday, the European Union ignored the calls of international aid agencies to prevent a humanitarian crisis from deteriorating further by sending 1,500 troops.

France, which holds the EU’s rotating presidency, was pushing for peacekeepers to bolster the UN operation, but Britain and Germany want to see the AU do more militarily, while promoting a political solution.

Europe’s reluctance to get involved has infuriated aid workers on the ground.

“Europe has a proven history and expertise in peacekeeping,” said Juliette Prodhan, local head of Oxfam. “It has created special standby battalions precisely to respond rapidly to crises like this. What more needs to happen for Europe to provide Congo with the help it so urgently needs?”

“My personal feeling is that I have an obscure sense of déjà-vu, except that the situation is many, many more times complicated because there are so many armed factions,” said Mr. Lapointe, who was in Rwanda during the 1994 genocide and the DRC during the civil war.

National Post

Posted by: people4people | November 17, 2008

Politicians and their lies about change

Posted by: people4people | November 17, 2008

The ills of elitist World Government

Posted by: people4people | June 23, 2008

2 Billion May Suffer from Cell phone cancer by 2020

Recent studies reveal that up to 2 billion people may suffer from cancer induced by radiation emitted from cellphones and other such devices by 2020. This is not the first time that studies have revealed the long term effects of gadgets like these.

ANI/Business Wire India
June 22, 2008

Cell phone cancer
The fatal and volumetric effects of electromagnetic radiation is emitted mainly by mobile phones, mobile phone antenna, tower, mast, transmission tower, microwave oven, wireless devices, system and equipment.

NEW DELHI: The studies and survey conducted by Australian Health Research Institute indicates that due to billions of times more in volume electromagnetic radiation emitted by billions of mobile phones, internet, intranet and wireless communication data transmission will make almost one-third of world population (about two billions) patient of ear, eye and brain cancer beside other major body disorders like heart ailments, impotency, migraine, epilepsy.

According to the reports the tissues of children are tender and are likely to be more effected by use of any wireless gadget and devices and they should not be encouraged to use mobile phone.

The fatal and volumetric effects of electromagnetic radiation emitted mainly by mobile phones, mobile phone antenna, tower, mast, transmission tower, microwave oven, wireless devices, system and equipment.

These dangerous effects have been certified and confirmed repeatedly by many leading medical and scientific research institutions of the world including Ministries of health of various governments, W.H.O. and now have been admitted and confirmed by Govt. of India in their recent press releases.

The attached image shows and proves about the serious ill effects of E.M. radiation released by Radiation Nuclear and Safety Authority of FINLAND as to how E.M. radiation emitted by mobile phones damages the various body cells and causes incurable and fatal disease.

infowars.com

Here is an article on the subject of abortion. This is a story from the Daily Mail about a baby who survived a abortion. Doctors thought that the baby would have defect upon birth yet, the baby is now expected to live a normal life.
By Liz Hull Last updated at 8:08 AM on 05th June 2008 

Finley Crampton really shouldn’t be here. Although his parents would have loved another child, they knew their baby could inherit a life-threatening kidney condition – and they couldn’t take the risk.

After all, their first son had died of the condition and the second was born with serious kidney damage.
So when Finley’s mother, Jodie Percival, became pregnant while on the Pill, she and her fiance Billy Crampton, 35, made the agonising decision to abort this child. ‘Deciding to terminate at eight weeks was just utterly horrible but I couldn’t cope with the anguish of losing another baby,’ said Miss Percival, 25.

However, Finley had other ideas. And some time after the operation, Miss Percival felt a fluttering in her stomach. Eventually her doctor sent her for a scan – and she discovered she was 19 weeks pregnant. The child had survived the abortion and thrived in the womb. ‘I couldn’t believe it,’ said Miss Percival. ‘This was the baby I thought I’d terminated. ‘At first I was angry that this was happening to us, that the procedure had failed. ‘I wrote to the hospital, I couldn’t believe that they had let me down like this. They wrote back and apologised and said it was very rare.’

But a week later, another scan confirmed that this baby had kidney problems too, like the couple’s previous children. Miss Percival carries a gene which triggers multicystic dysplastic kidney – which causes cysts to grow on the kidneys of an unborn baby. Her first baby, Thane, had lived for only 20 minutes after she was forced to deliver him prematurely. Her second son, Lewis, now 20 months, was born with a similar condition. He survives on one kidney. However, doctors told the couple from Sutton-in-Ashfield, Nottinghamshire, that this child was likely to survive, so they decided he deserved a chance.

And in November, Finley was born three weeks premature, at 6lb 3oz. He had minor kidney damage but is expected to lead a normal life. ‘I knew if that operation hadn’t failed he wouldn’t have been there,’ said Miss Percival, a hairdresser. ‘I just couldn’t believe that this child had got through it all and looked so perfect. ‘He may need an operation but as only one of his kidneys is affected he can survive. ‘I still struggle to believe just what he has fought through. Now he’s here I wouldn’t change it for the world.’

Recently, 111 countries signed a treaty that would ban the use cluster bombs in those respective countries. A few major world powers were absent from the meeting notably, The United, Russia, China and Israel. Here’s and article on the subject and the dangers of these cluster bombs.

DUBLIN (AFP) — A landmark international convention banning cluster munitions was formally adopted by 111 countries here Friday, in a move organisers hope will stigmatise the lethal weapons as much as landmines.

Diplomats adopted the treaty without objection at the end of 12 days of robust negotiation at Croke Park stadium in the Irish capital.

The wide-ranging pact bans the use, production, transfer and stockpiling of cluster munitions. It also provides for helping victims and clearing contaminated areas within 10 years.

The treaty requires the destruction of stockpiles within eight years — though it leaves the door open for future, more precise generations of cluster bombs that pose less harm to civilians.

UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon hailed it as “a new international standard that will enhance the protection of civilians, strengthen human rights and improve prospects for development.”

The convention is due to be signed in Oslo on December 2-3. It comes into force once 30 states have ratified it.

Politicians and campaigners described the adoption as hugely significant, despite the absence of the United States, China, Russia, Israel, India and Pakistan — all major cluster bomb stockpilers and producers.

But supporters said they hoped the treaty would pressure them to change track or shame them into not using cluster bombs.

“We all know that there are important states not present, but I am convinced that we will have succeeded in stigmatising any future use of cluster munitions,” Irish Foreign Minister Micheal Martin said.

Norwegian Foreign Minister Jonas Gahr Stoere, whose country spearheaded the process, said in Oslo that “the door is open” to other states.

“We have created a framework which is now allowing countries to join and I hope to see that,” he said.

Alongside him, British counterpart David Miliband, whose country dropped objections to the draft treaty on Thursday, breaking the deadlock in Dublin, added: “It’s up to us to make sure it generates momentum in the process.”

Slovenia, which currently holds the European Union presidency, said the new convention would have “a tremendous positive influence on the ground”.

The United States has defended its non-attendance, saying it was “deeply concerned” about the humanitarian impact of cluster bombs and all weapons of war, despite “disagreements” about the best way forward.

Dropped from planes or fired from artillery, cluster bombs explode in mid-air, scattering bomblets, with many civilians having been killed or maimed in heavily-bombed countries like Laos, Vietnam and Afghanistan by their indiscriminate, wide area effect.

They also pose a lasting threat as many bomblets fail to explode on impact.

Norwegian Deputy Defence Minister Espen Barth Eide told AFP that countries wanted their military actions to be seen as legitimate, and compared the potential impact of the Dublin text to the 1997 Ottawa Treaty on landmines.

“With the landmine treaty, the US did not sign it but we don’t really care because they behave as if they have signed it because they recognise they are morally outlawed,” he said.

The Cluster Munition Coalition, an umbrella group of non-governmental organisations, said it would now be “politically impossible” for countries to use such weapons without a backlash.

It was “deeply disappointed” by an article on how countries may assist non-signatory states and said it would work to ensure it did not become a “loophole”.

Steve Goose, from Human Rights Watch, said they would pressure signatories to clear non-signatories’ stockpiles from their soil.

“This treaty will make the world a safer place for millions of people. Cluster munitions have been tossed on the ash heap of history,” he said.

Afghan campaigner Soraj Ghulam Habib, who was 10 when his legs were blown off by a cluster bomb, said he now felt his suffering was not in vain.

“Victims need a lot of support and now work can be done to make victims self-reliant, not let them be like beggars on the street,” the 17-year-old told AFP.

“I hope that cluster munitions will never again be used by any states.”

Read More…

Older Posts »

Categories